Live Sinter uses a multi-physics engine capable of simulating the complex forces and deformation that parts experience during sintering, and automatically generates "negative offset" geometry which, when sintered, results in straight, defect-free parts. Knowing that in order to have a good performance of MachSim, it's advised that sum of STL should be around Xx KB would help.This penchant for integration meshes well with Desktop Metal's holistic approach to AM from the creation of proprietary metal powders to the sintering of parts in its advanced Furnace solution and the first-of-its-kind Live Sinter application. How far should we clean them and reduce their size, this is the data that I miss. What has final impact on machine Simulation ? The sum of each STL size together that are used in Machine Simulaion?Īlso would be nice to know STL size limit considered as "light", "medium", "heavy" for machine simulation for which above these sizes we will get Fast, medium, slow performance. If it's only 5% faster, it's another story If I can achieve a 50% faster Machine Simulation performance, it's worth it to spend 1 hour to clean 3D model. Knowing the final impact on MachSim would help to convince ourself to spend more time to clean the models before to build MachSim. This is clearly a good practice that we should all apply.īut sometimes during busy moment, its hard to spend time on it. Okīut what is the impact on Machine Simulation usage?įaster during playing Machine Simulation ? We see the difference of STL File size in the video.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |